Binary and package analysis
Inspect executables, libraries, installers, manifests, signatures, debug artifacts, hardcoded endpoints, secrets, unsafe compiler options, permissions, and dependency loading behavior.
Desktop and thick client penetration testing for binaries, local storage, update mechanisms, IPC, custom protocols, backend trust, and privilege boundaries.
EXPERT-LED · MANUAL VALIDATION
Desktop software blends local operating-system risk with remote APIs, proprietary protocols, update channels, and privileged components. Testing examines the client as attacker-controlled while validating whether local manipulation can cross security boundaries.

HOW THE TESTING FEELS IN PRACTICE
Automation gives coverage. The findings that matter come from someone chaining weak controls together, questioning assumptions, and checking what a motivated attacker could reach next.
ASSESSMENT COVERAGE
Coverage is finalized during scoping, then tested with a mix of systematic checks and manual attack-path analysis.
Inspect executables, libraries, installers, manifests, signatures, debug artifacts, hardcoded endpoints, secrets, unsafe compiler options, permissions, and dependency loading behavior.
Review configuration, logs, caches, databases, temporary files, registry or preferences, keychain use, tokens, memory exposure, crash dumps, and multi-user separation.
Test named pipes, sockets, RPC, COM, XPC, services, URL handlers, file associations, shared memory, local web servers, plugins, and trust between low and high privilege components.
Assess update discovery, transport, signatures, rollback, package integrity, installer permissions, search-order hijacking, repair behavior, and whether untrusted users can influence privileged updates.
Proxy or instrument standard and custom protocols to test authentication, authorization, certificate validation, replay, message integrity, API trust, and client-controlled values.
Validate file and directory permissions, service configuration, DLL or library loading, helper tools, scheduled tasks, sandbox assumptions, and paths from standard user to elevated execution.
RULES OF ENGAGEMENT FIRST
Every phase is designed to produce defensible evidence without taking unnecessary operational risk.
Agree targets, environments, identities, exclusions, test windows, data handling, escalation contacts, and stop conditions before testing starts.
Map sensitive assets, trust boundaries, data flows, likely attackers, and high-impact misuse cases so the test reflects the product rather than a generic checklist.
Use repeatable tooling and standards-aligned checks to cover the agreed surface while recording assumptions, constraints, and evidence.
Challenge identity, authorization, workflows, configuration, integrations, and chained weaknesses that require human context and adversarial reasoning.
Use the minimum proof required to establish exploitability. Destructive actions, persistence, and unnecessary data access stay outside scope unless separately authorized.
Deliver risk context, reproduction evidence, root-cause fixes, and a stakeholder walkthrough. One retest round verifies agreed remediation.
ACTIONABLE OUTPUTS
The report is written for two audiences: stakeholders who need a clear risk decision and engineers who need enough detail to reproduce and fix the issue.
KEEP REVIEWING YOUR CONTROLS
COMMON SCOPING QUESTIONS
Windows and macOS applications can be scoped. Linux desktop or specialized clients can be reviewed after confirming packaging, runtime, and test-environment requirements.
Yes. Package integrity, signatures, transport, rollback, permissions, privileged helpers, repair behavior, and library loading paths can be included.
Yes when a test environment, representative traffic, protocol context, and safe operating constraints are available. Instrumentation and message manipulation may be used.
No. A black-box binary assessment is possible. Targeted source or symbols can improve analysis of complex local trust and update logic when available.
CLEAR SCOPE · CONTROLLED TESTING · USEFUL REPORT
Share the target, environment, roles, and objective. The service field is already selected so you can send the right context quickly.
TELL US ABOUT YOUR SCOPE
Share a few details about the target and your goals. We will reply with the right testing approach and a clear proposal.
Protected against automated submissions. Only submit systems you own or are authorized to test. Do not include passwords, API keys, or other secrets.